Race is a myth


 


Race is a myth. A lot of things are actually – Gender, race, religious conflict, I could go on.

They are social constructs that were designed to keep humans apart, to create divisions that have historically justified wars, slavery and oppression on the basis of factors beyond the control of anyone.

To fully understand this, we have to go way back into the history of human beings – To evaluate why things are the way they are with reference to population distribution and the reasons for it, using the widely accepted theories formulated by really cool people like Charles Darwin and Karl Marx.

 But before that, we have to disclaim two things.

1.       There is an important distinction to be made between one’s skin color and one’s race. Skin color is a biological phenomenon relating to how much melanin is in your skin and has a lot to do with ideas of natural selection and migration. Race refers to the ideas surrounding one’s skin color in association with their ethnicity. The difference between the two is parallel to the difference between sex and gender.  

2.       There is a greater correlation between one’s geographical location and their skin color than between one’s ethnicity and their skin color. 

With that, we begin.

Seven million years ago in east Africa, humans first appeared. We know not of the exact circumstances surrounding this appearance, nor of the numbers in which they appeared, but what we do know is that when they appeared, they began to reproduce so rapidly that they soon overpopulated the available space.

Note that these people were fairly homogenous – They had a very close common ancestor but moreover, lived under the exact same conditions for the most part, meaning that if mutations happened, they were either a) very minute or b) inconsequential. These people, by virtue of living in the equatorial regions of the African continent developed dark skin. They had little body hair. They were the first ‘black people’.

But the story of a population is never that straightforward.

After a few generations, the population of these humans grew too large. The story of scarcity begins here – There were too many people with too many needs and even more wants and so, they began to break up in groups and settle in other parts of the world. Different periods of exposure to sunshine here led to varying degrees of importance of the melanin in the skins of these humans and mutations passed onto succeeding generations, coupled with the diets of these humans (e.g. more fish and vegetables in northern Asia, more meat in Southern Africa) led to these differences in skin color.

Somewhere along the lines however, the world got even more populated and with increasing competition for resources, war was born, beginning as being direct fist-to-fist combat. But this too lost effectiveness eventually. Promptly, humans had to think of another solution. Suddenly, women were being denied of opportunities because they were “too weak” to take them up and better suited for household work. From nowhere, black people were “uncivilized” and good “only for labour in factories and cotton farms.” Suddenly, entire communities of people were no longer entitled to civil liberties, and in the greatest act of systematic oppression, discrimination was born.

The problem with this was that these ideas were never proven to be true. They were, in many cases, opinions that were argued and explained to a select group of people in such a way as to speak to their interests and to make rejecting such ideas seem almost outrageous. What European capitalist would pass off the once in a lifetime opportunity to trade human beings by displacing them, putting them on ships where living conditions were horrendous and selling them for a few hundred dollars in North America? What man in the nth century would pass off being regarded as the superior gender, revered for their purported strength and emotional stability, even at the expense of the supposed inferior gender?

The acceptance of these ideas by first generation misogynists, racists, etc. led to their being suggested to people within their spheres of influence and inculcated into their offspring. The effect of this was like wildfire, spreading rapidly and gaining leverage and eventually finding itself in Parliaments where in the final blow to human rights, they were inscribed as fact in Constitutions across the world where in many cases they still stand today, a testament to the power of an opinion.

But the thing is, nobody ever took the time to interrogate these values.

Because had we taken the time to sit and understand the underlying principles behind the many ideas, we hold today about the many issues we face, we’d realize how baseless they are. And it is a very special kind of wisdom to be able to pick apart ideas, to critique them and to decide on their admissibility.

Race is a myth. A lot of things are actually – Gender, race, religious conflict, I could go on. But they are myths that have become so inculcated into our minds that the only way deal with them is to work with them, i.e. it is far too late to start reconstructing the ideas of race. Perhaps one day it will be possible. But for now, advocacy has to focus on working within the system: Acknowledging the existence of gender and trading that off for the sake of advocacy for, in the very least, equality of these imposed ideologies. But this serves as a clarion call regarding the ideas we are predisposed to accepting, many a time, without dissecting them and analyzing their core beliefs, and the potential threat that exists regarding the ideas we normalize and how they impact future generations. 

Race is a myth. It is a myth that has become a reality because of the many years of history attached to it. Despite the fact that it is an idea that was created with a certain agenda in mind, its execution through things like the Transatlantic Slave Trade and racial profiling around the world has made it a reality that all too many people are forced to experience. It, together with many other things, is a social construct that was designed to keep humans apart; to create divisions that have historically justified wars, slavery and oppression on the basis of factors beyond the control of anyone.

They exist as thorns in the sides of a progressive world and were designed to keep people under control – To limit their capacity to actualize by instilling ideas about themselves and their communities into their minds; the wrong ideas.

These ideas are flawed and baseless. 

And they must go. 

Sincerely,

Muku

Photo by Clay Banks on Unsplash

Comments

  1. This here is revolutionary thinking. I really appreciate that you took your time to do this. Honestly, the effects of these ideas even spreads to our economies, that's why you see large instances of brain drain occurring from Africa, Because we have this notion that out there is better than what we have here. We lose valuable skills and knowledge to supposedly superior or more developed countries. This leaves us with a less skilled workforce and ultimately a dying economy. We have leaders giving away precious resources for peanuts, pocketing the funds and further destroying the economy. Instead of reinvesting the money into the economy and buying infrastructure to process said resources, increasing their value tenfold. In conclusion, Africans should abandon every idea of the world that they have and face the hard truth that we can sustain ourselves. We don't need anyone else, we don't need loans or foreign aid. We are fine by ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great effort but still somewhat unfortunate. Discrimination and violence are traditionally thought to be driven by economic reasons but I think it's a little deeper than that. Still unexplained are the crusades, stalinist communism and of course the Holocaust. Further, I don't think race is a social construct in the sense of it being baseless. There are real an marked differences between people of various skin tones. Scientifically, races can be differentiated in this way. Same applies to gender. There are gender idiosyncrasies informed by the underlying biology. I think reducing all of the complex factors to simple economics is not so wise

    Best
    Dumo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In many ways, I agree with a lot of what you're saying. Most certainly on the surface, there may not be an immediate, economically grounded explanation for things like the Holocaust and most certainly there exist scientific bases for a lot of the ideas that we hold. With regards to the latter though, the existence of a scientific explanation doesn't equate to a universally true idea (ironically enough!). I mean, of course to someone it makes sense that women who birth the babies should be the ones to stay at home and take care of them, as is done in the animal kingdom. But that idea isn't true. It was made to be true - It was accepted to be true for whatever reason and we've seen that it's very possible for scientific explanations to hold true without compromising the position that women play in socio-economic and political spaces e.g. Jacinda Arden, the first female head of state to have a baby while in office, who's doing a great job of running New Zealand (better assimilation of women into spaces, strong health systems, etc.). With regards to the former though, I think that's the idea I'm trying to put across. Anti-Semitism became so deeply ingrained in the minds of the Nazis that it only MADE SENSE to conduct the largest genocide in the history of the world (linking to the previous issue) but also, indirectly, it all boils down to a constant struggle for resources. Hitler believed the Jews were monopolozing the economic space for example and as such, the Holocaust was born, with the assistance of Himmler and friends. It is a struggle that transcends its own self-imposed limitatioms to the economic space and turns into ideas that become commonplace and I think that's the idea I was trying to put across here - In many cases, the ideas we hold are grounded on a strife for resources and are used to disclude people from this strife by propagating certain ideologies about said people. And this goes way back into the history of the world. Today, these ideas survive, but not for any reason anyone can explain. Many people don't actually have an explanation for why they're racist for example, or misogynist. "It's just how it is". But their ancestors who passed down such ideologies onto them had 'perfectly logical' explanations for their ideas. Those explanations held value back then but today, only serve to slow down progress. I'd love to get in touch and talk more about this if you like. I'd be really interested in hearing what you have to say. Perhaps we can reach a middle ground somewhere somehow.

      Regards,
      Muku

      Delete
    2. I too, agree with most of what you are saying. Particularly on the idea that most of these narratives instantiated in culture are now outdated although I have my reservations particularly with the idea of women oppression. It's not like back then men had their foot on women's necks- I think that's hardly the case. Reproduction was just very shitty back then and without contraception, bottled milk or sanitary pads, women were forced to stay at home as primary caregivers. No one planned it to be that way, it just was and it was good. Now women are beginning to participate productively over and above reproduction. This is good but it's a slow process but things are moving. I really don't like blanket statements that vilify men or white people or any other supposedly priviledged demographic. In fighting prejudice, a lot of activists make these prejudicial claims which is kind of ironic.

      Anyway, the science thing was really just an example. I'm more of a philosopher than a scientist. Science is my aid and mistress. I think what is missing in your very brilliant analysis is Jung, Nietzsche, Jordan Peterson, Yuval Harari et al. Psychologists and those who have studied the phenomenological history of our species.

      Emotions and motivations are a bit of a blindspot in our collective knowledge but these men have made heroic attempts. I suggest you acquaint yourself with them. They will teach you that beyond economics there is will to power, will to meaning, naivety and good old fucking malevolence.

      PS - Adolf Hitler was not a cold hearted economist. He was a resentful person who had the little man problem,a difficult childhood and daddy issues. It's not obvious to me or any of the psychoanalytic thinkers that his motivations were anything vengeance for the suffering of his own life and the desire for total destruction- a philosophy you religious fundamentalists refer to, in a mystical sense, as satanism.

      Anyway, briefly on race and gender. In as much as the pigmentation of the skin is an arbitrary characteristic that should not be attended by socioeconomic priviledges, it is unfortunate that people on the african continent, who happen to be black do have a character particular to them. They are for instance an extremely religious race, relatively and objectively. Let's not get into the economics. It is differences like this that give rise to said pathological narratives. The racism comes in when you want to apply those characteristics to particular individuals without considering their personal merits and demerits.
      What am I saying?
      Agreed, misogyny, racism and the like are not good ideologies but that doesn't mean they are baseless or that they exist arbitrarily.
      Therefore, it is key to understanding where these narratives come from first before we can think about solutions.
      Case in point, Black people commit 80% of the homicides in New York city and yet they make up less than 15% of the population. How does this impact the narrative.
      The IQ distributions of men and women are not identical. Men have a greater variation. That means that the top 1% in any society, in this regard is dominated by men. Does that mean the society is patriarchal? No. It just means that the 5 richest people in the world are men. Doesn't change the fact that men have worse jobs or do worse in school or that they can't fail in their life and set up shop in someone else's.

      These are highlights of the complex ideas that leave me feeling like your viewpoint, although sincere, is quite simplistic

      Delete

Post a Comment